Final June, simply months after the discharge of ChatGPT from OpenAI, a few New York Metropolis attorneys infamously used the instrument to put in writing a really poor temporary. The AI cited faux instances, resulting in an uproar, an indignant choose and two very embarrassed attorneys. It was proof that whereas bots like ChatGPT may be useful, you actually should examine their work rigorously, particularly in a authorized context.
The case didn’t escape the oldsters at LexisNexis, a authorized software program firm that gives tooling to assist attorneys discover the suitable case regulation to make their authorized arguments. The corporate sees the potential of AI in serving to cut back a lot of the mundane authorized work that each lawyer undertakes, however it additionally acknowledges these very actual points because it begins its generative AI journey.
Jeff Reihl, chief know-how officer at LexisNexis, understands the worth of AI. In truth, his firm has been constructing the know-how into its platform for a while now. However having the ability to add ChatGPT-like performance to its authorized toolbox would assist attorneys work extra effectively: serving to with temporary writing and discovering citations sooner.
“We as a company have been working with AI applied sciences for a lot of years. I feel what is basically, actually totally different now since ChatGPT got here out in November, is the chance to generate textual content and the conversational features that include this know-how,” Reihl informed TechCrunch+.